Author: wordpressence

The European Union: The World’s most expansionist empire, in maps and charts

Montage Facts4EU.Org 2021

Despite the loss of its 2nd-largest member country, the EU’s expansionist march seems relentless

In just 64 years, the EU has expanded beyond recognition. It started quietly as the European Economic Community (EEC) which was founded by six countries in 1957 with the Treaty of Rome.

Sixteen years passed before its first expansion in 1973 when it increased its number of countries by 50%. Since then its acquisitive nature has gathered pace and become more apparent.

Today Brexit Facts4EU.Org tells the story of the World’s most expansionist empire, in simple maps, charts, and facts and figures.

In this three-part series we ask: Is the EU now the most dangerous world threat to individual nationhood, cultural identity, personal freedoms, and the established global order?

Part one – countries, land, people

By any measure, and despite the EU’s loss of the United Kingdom, the EEC/EU’s expansion over the past 50 years has been continuous and significant.

Which new member countries does the EU have in its sights?

The EU has five candidate countries in process, and there are two potential candidate countries currently listed by the EU Commission. These are:-

Five official candidate countries in process:

• Albania
• Republic of North Macedonia
• Montenegro
• Serbia
• Turkey

Two potential candidate countries on the list:

• Bosnia and Herzegovina
• Kosovo

If these seven countries all join, then our maps above would look like this

 

© Brexit Facts4EU.Org (using mapchart.net) – click to enlarge

[ Sources: EU Commission | World Bank | OECD ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.

Brexit Facts4EU.Org, Thur 29 Jul 2021

Click here to go to our news headlines

Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
And don’t forget to actually post your message after you have previewed it!

The UK’s eradication of Erasmus was the right thing to do, and here’s why

Montage © Facts4EU.Org – The EU’s Erasmus and the UK’s Alan Turing OBE FRS, (codebreaker and inventor of the first stored program computer)

Facts4EU.Org’s simple explainer of why the UK left the EU’s expensive youth indoctrination plan

Yesterday we looked at the new Turing Scheme to replace the EU’s Erasmus+. Today we look again at Erasmus+ itself, and why it was never right for the United Kingdom’s needs. This report has been updated with new information since our last reports in January.

With the UK taking seven out of the ten top places in the Times’ list of “Best universities in Europe 2021”, it is clear that the EU needs the UK far more than the UK needs the EU, when it comes to student exchanges. No wonder the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) reports that an astonishing 143,000 students from the EU27 were studying in the UK in the academic year 2018/2019. (Note: All figures for student numbers in this report are for the last year for which data is available – 2018/2019.)

We present the facts about Erasmus – the EU scheme to indoctrinate the youth of a continent

1. Is Erasmus+ a university student exchange programme?

No, it is not. Here is how the EU Commission describes it:

“Erasmus+ is the EU’s programme to support education, training, youth and sport in Europe.”

“It is open to school pupils, higher education and vocational education and training students, adult learners, youth exchanges, youth workers and sport coaches.”

This is not a description of an exchange programme, allowing students at UK universities to spend part of their degree courses at EU universities. It is a far wider programme, involving sport, youth and adult work, and other activities, and it is vastly expensive, costing billions. (See below.)

2. How many UK university students have benefited from Erasmus+?

This is the key question. How many students benefited for the billions the UK has spent with the EU on the Erasmus+ programme?

3. How much of the Erasmus budget did the EU spend on students?

A full two-thirds of the Erasmus+ budget isn’t for any form of exchanges for young people at all. It’s for “partnerships and reforms of the education and youth sectors.” Only one-third of the budget is for “learning opportunities abroad for young people”.

© Facts4EU.Org – click to enlarge

4. How much did it cost UK and EU taxpayers?

In 2019, the UK received only €87m (£79 million GBP) in grants for higher education students. This is out of a total EU budget for Erasmus+ of €16.4 billion over the period 2014-2020, an average of €2.34bn euros per year or £2 billion pounds per year. This includes the ‘extras’ which the EU spends for Erasmus+ outside the EU.

These already huge costs have already risen dramatically this year, as the Erasmus budget has just been increased by an eye-watering 74%. The new budget (including the extras) is €28.4bn compared to 16.38bn in the last budget.

The UK Government has now pledged £110m (GBP) for the new Turing Scheme to replace Erasmus. That is 39% more than the £79 million the UK received back for its students, from its contributions to the EU under Erasmus+.

We should also point out that €1.7bn of the EU’s budget went to other countries outside the EU, as part of the EU’s ‘External Action’ programme. This carried on throughout 2020, despite the UK having no say in how the money was spent.

5. So what really is Erasmus+, and why is it dangerous?

Erasmus+ is part of the “EU Youth Strategy” and the “European Education Area”. Here is what the EU Commission has to say about these.

“The EU Youth Strategy should contribute to realising this vision of young people by mobilising EU level policy instruments as well as actions at national, regional and local level by all stakeholders.”

“Erasmus+ doesn’t just have opportunities for students… it has opportunities for a wide variety of individuals and organisations…. Erasmus+ also aims to promote the sustainable development of its partners in the field of higher education, and contribute to achieving the objectives of the EU Youth Strategy.”

In October 2020 the EU Commission announced that it will be completing a “European Education Area” by 2025, thereby moving one further step towards the homogenisation of the formerly independent nation states of Europe.

For years the EU has been achieving its goal by targeting young people with continuous propaganda and ‘initiatives’ as we have reported many times before. Here is what they said about their latest move:-

“The European Education Area is underpinned by six dimensions: quality, inclusion and gender equality, green and digital transitions, teachers, higher education, a stronger Europe in the world. Initiatives will inter alia look at ways to enhance quality, notably with regard to basic and digital skills and to make school education more inclusive and gender sensitive and improve school success. They will help strengthen understanding of climate change and sustainability, foster the greening of education infrastructure, support the teaching profession, further roll out European Universities and enhance connectivity among education and training institutions.

“The Communication sets out the means and milestones to achieve the European Education Area by 2025, supported by Europe’s Recovery Plan (NextGenerationEU) and the Erasmus+ Programme.”

In short, Erasmus+ is not a student exchange programme. It is part of a concerted strategy from the EU Commission to indoctrinate the youth of Europe.

6. How have the teaching staff done out of Erasmus+?

Our analysis shows that the pro-EU and anti-Brexit teaching staff who are so in favour of Erasmus+ have benefited rather more than their students.

According to the EU Commission a total of 3,962 UK teaching staff used Erasmus+ in 2019. With HESA reporting total staff numbers of 217,065 this equates to 1.8% of the teaching body – a take-up of more than four times the proportion of their student population.

Perhaps this helps to explain the huge proportion of the teaching profession who voted to Remain.

UK teaching staff are massively anti-Brexit

• 75% of secondary school teachers backed Remain
• Nearly 90% of university lecturers backed Remain

© Brexit Facts4EU.Org – click the chart to enlarge

Above is how the teaching profession voted in the EU Referendum, according to the Times Educational Supplement survey at the time.

[ Sources: EU Commission | Higher Education Statistics Agency | Times Educational Supplement | UK Dept of Education ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.

Brexit Facts4EU.Org, Thur 05 Aug 2021

Click here to go to our news headlines

Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
And don’t forget to actually post your message after you have previewed it!

This donation page is for CIBUK and Facts4EU’s ‘The Independence Documentary’

You will receive an automated response, and then later you will get a warm and friendly ‘thank you’ email from a member of our team.

If you would like to support our work more generally too…

To support Facts4EU’s work more generally, please also make a donation on our main ‘Help Us’ page here.

Thanks to people like you, we’re still here fighting for a free, independent, and sovereign United Kingdom. We’ve done this with your help, and without any assistance from foreign billionaires. Our support has come from ordinary members of the public like you, who voted for a true Brexit.

Thank you so much

Best regards, the Facts4EU.Org Team

Facts4EU.Org presents documented evidence of an international scandal

Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2022

Is the PM’s New Year’s resolution to resolve the NI issue and reunite the United Kingdom?
And with the US President slated to visit in March, does anyone care if he cancels?

The latest comments out of the White House suggest that US President Joe Biden will not visit the UK and the Republic of Ireland unless the current difficulties over the N.I. Protocol are sorted out.

Just before Christmas, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak put in a call to EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at which the Protocol was discussed.

Given that the mood music coming out of No.10 reeks of the compromise and weakness of the Theresa May years, Facts4EU.Org felt that both No.10 and the White House should read an excerpt from the second-most popular report we published in 2022.

We hope this will inform the badly-informed US President, as well as stiffening the sinews of the PM and his Cabinet in talks with the EU.

The story never told by the BBC

Five years ago Facts4EU.Org published the testimony of the heads of the Irish Revenue and HMRC, followed up by the testimony of the EU parliament’s expert.

All of them made it clear there was no need for a “Northern Ireland Protocol”.

The EU then conspired with the government of Leo Varadkar to prevent the customs services of the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom from talking to each other.

Today, together with CIBUK.Org – of which Facts4EU.Org is an affiliate member – we are placing the facts on record once again.

The testimonies

Facts4EU.Org has chapter and verse of the testimonies of the key parties involved in ensuring trade would continue normally across the North-South border in Ireland following Brexit.

Below we present some key extracts which make it clear that there was never any need for an N.I. Protocol and that Mr Varadkar’s government and the EU Commission did what they did in order to divide the United Kingdom – for their own political ends.

Back in 2017, testimony to the parliaments was given on the basis that the entire UK (including Northern Ireland) would be OUT of the Single Market, and OUT of the Customs Union. In other words, with no Protocol and what was deemed “the worst case”.

[ Sources: UK Parliament | Irish parliament | EU Commission | EU Parliament ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.

Brexit Facts4EU.Org, Thurs 29 Dec 2022

Click here to go to our news headlines

Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
And don’t forget to actually post your message after you have previewed it!

What is the ‘Go WTO’ campaign?

   

   

The simple idea is for the public to make clear to the Remain-dominated Parliament that the Referendum vote must be respected in full and that the UK must leave the EU – NOW.

Given the failure of the Government to negotiate a Withdrawal Deal which is remotely acceptable to the vast majority of people – or MPs – this means leaving the EU on WTO terms, which is the default position in Article 50 and the default position in the legislation passed by the UK Parliament last year.

What can you do to help?

Without you this campaign is nothing. Unless you do something, all the many hundreds of hours put in by many people will be in vain.

There is one major, incontrovertible priority for all those who voted to leave the European Union in the Referendum and who wish to see this implemented NOW.

Forget rallies preaching to the converted, forget protests outside Parliament, forget tweeting, forget posting on Facebook… you can even forget talking back angrily to the BBC or Sky News whilst watching their anti-Brexit coverage.

Put all these things on hold and do one thing.

We are now entering the final Battle for Brexit

Quite simply, there is nothing you can do which is more important than threatening the livelihood of your MP. This is the only thing which might influence some of these anti-democratic and arrogant MPs, and convince them of the strength of feeling around the country.

Appeals to them to read some actual facts about Brexit won’t work on their own. So many of them stand up in the Commons day after day and repeat what they’re been told, despite not having the barest acquaintance with any of the official facts we’ve been churning out daily for three years.

Our advice is to hit them where it matters to them : their majorities, and the vote share of their parties.

Letters, surgery visits, calls, and (only in the last resort) emails

Once again we must stress that sending an email to your MP is of limited value. They already receive thousands and it’s mostly their assistants who deal with them. Thousands of letters are much more difficult to overlook.

Below are some options and ideas which you could use. These come from our library of letters and flyers. The best thing of all of course is to go to your MP’s surgery and tell them in person. Or call their constituency office or their number in Parliament. Failing that, please send them one of our letters, or much better still write one of your own.

Some of our latest one-page flyers are below

(“Is the EU a trading bloc or political project?”, “EU Defence Union Pt 1”, “EU Defence Union Pt 1”, “Brexit is economic equivalent of 18 member states leaving at once”)

You can download any of these as a PDF by just clicking on it. Please then send it to your MP today.

All the advice has been available in our ‘Brexit Battle Pack’ since last summer. It’s full of information on how you can act to achieve the best possible effect. It even includes advice on how to contact the media when they produce biased reports.

“I’ve received 3 times as many letters from pro-Remain constituents”

– A Remain MP who thinks we must delay Brexit

Who is backing it?

We have 4 lead MPs, 3 lead MEPs, and 15 pro-Brexit organisations all supporting this public campaign. It was initiated by us, Brexit Facts4EU.Org, but this is your campaign – for ordinary voters.

It is important for any public campaign like this to have the support of MPs who respect the vote to leave the European Union. All four have made themselves available for interviews with the BBC, Sky News, and ITN, as well as to the press.

Headline politicians and pro-Brexit organisations backing the #GoWTO public campaign:-

• The Rt Hon David Jones MP (Con)
  Formerly Minister of State for Exiting the European Union and formerly Secretary of State for Wales
• Andrea Jenkyns MP (Con)
  MP for Morley and Outwood, who famously defeated Ed Balls in 2015. Member of the Exiting the European Union Select Committee
• Graham Stringer MP (Lab)
  Member of Parliament for Blackley and Broughton, a consistent and prominent Eurosceptic in the Parliamentary Labour Party
• Anne Marie Morris MP (Con)
  Member of Parliament for Newton Abbot, an increasingly popular Eurosceptic in her constituency and in the ERG

On behalf of our readers we would like to thank our supporting MPs and MEPs for putting aside their political differences in the national interest.

What does the ‘Go WTO’ campaign consist of?

• PDF summaries of the “Go WTO” solution, to send to MPs
• Press release and PR team in place, to get supporting MPs onto TV and in the papers
• Widespread, paid social media campaign
• Specially-created tiles (images with text embedded with punchy messages) for social media
• Summary articles on aspects of WTO exit, with a dedicated WTO section
• This newly-revamped, user-friendly website

The only thing that can now make a difference

Parliament has shown itself to be full of people who don’t respect democracy, despite using it to gain their current employment. Specifically they don’t respect the result of the EU Referendum.

They must now be told to respect the Referendum result, and vote to allow the UK to leave NOW on WTO terms with some sensible side agreements on things like citizens’ rights. They must be told that if they do not, you will never vote for them again.

Remember…

Remain groups have been active in the last two and a half years, while most Leave groups slept. (Brexit Facts4EU.Org were the only group which carried on researching and publishing on 24 June 2016 and every day since.)

 

Sadly, MPs have been allowed to gain the view that the majority who voted for Leave will not kick up a fuss. Please help us to prove them wrong.

We rely on the public’s support to continue. Please give something today if you can and you’ll also get access to our Brexit Index. We badly need your help to carry on.

Last update: 17 Apr 2019

For MPs and members of the public who need the Brexit basics – fast

© Brexit Facts4EU.Org

Summary of factsheets to date

The Brexit Fightback Initiative is a superb series of one-pagers on all aspects of Brexit. Every few days we add a new one, until we run out of money. Here we condense our years of research of official EU information into easily-digestible chunks. One topic per one-pager.

Naturally we can’t include all the facts on each subject or these one-pagers would become 10-pagers and no-one would read them. Instead we have picked some key facts for each topic.

Below are the factsheets available to date. We will update this page each time we produce a new factsheet.

Produced by Brexit Facts4EU.Org, each factsheet is endorsed by some or all of the following Brexit organisations, acting independently

© Logos are the copyright of each organisation

Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.

Brexit Facts4EU.Org. Latest update: 05 November 2019

Click here to go to our news headlines

No food on the shelves, thousands of animals being slaughtered, petrol pumps empty: what Europeans are being told

Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2021

Who will counter this if Facts4EU.Org doesn’t?

Once again, Germany’s state-funded international broadcaster has published a headline article which presents a one-sided view of Brexit, quoting Remainers and the pro-Remain Guardian.

For years Facts4EU.Org has argued that the British government should counter the relentless anti-Brexit (and often anti-British) rhetoric pouring out of the EU Commission and from so much of the media across the EU27. Below we present another example of this – from yesterday.

Deutsche Welle is akin to BBC World, broadcasting to the World but from a German perspective. It is funded by the German federal tax budget, and as such might be expected to attempt some impartiality in its reporting. Unfortunately, as with the BBC, this is often sadly lacking.

It has been widely reported that the fuel shortages mentioned in the above article were caused by a statement by a logistics organisation which was always pro-Remain. This resulted in unnecessary panic buying.

In regard to HGV driver shortages, these have occurred across the EU, including Germany, and we reported on this previously. Our most recent report (10 Dec 2021) on the subject showed a 22% increase in the number EU HGV drivers. Readers might wish to remind themselves of this report: “EU drivers in Brexit Britain have risen by 22% in the last quarter”.

Deutsche Welle’s story yesterday is the latest example from many others

Two years ago we wrote on this same subject, illustrating the point with an article by Deutsche Welle’s senior Brussels correspondent. Readers can view this here.

We must make it clear that this appeared in the opinion section in 2019. Nevertheless it was written (in English) by the senior Brussels correspondent of this international media organisation, which is funded by the German federal government.

As such it gives an insight into some of the thinking of the continental media regarding Brexit, and about the UK’s government.

[ Sources: Deutsche Welle ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.

Brexit Facts4EU.Org, New Year’s Eve, 31 Dec 2021

Click here to go to our news headlines

Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
And don’t forget to actually post your message after you have previewed it!

Nominate your choice by replying and we will rank the most popular in a special report early next year

Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2021

It has been almost a year since the legal exit for most (but not all) of the UK became reality – what do you think has been the best outcome of Brexit that we could not have enjoyed without leaving the EU?

Merry Christmas! We thought while you are hopefully relaxing and before the New Year we’d ask you a question – what’s your favourite Brexit Bonus?

It is of course entirely your choice, but to kick things off we’ve suggested five possible nominations that might be up there with the rest. Feel free to nominate these as part of your own list.

In no particular order of merit:

• Full democratic control of decisions that affect us
  It is now up to us; we cannot keep passing the blame on to other countries and institutions when in the past we have been ‘Gilding the Brussels Lilly’, but must now hold our politicians to account for not using the freedoms and powers that they have to make the changes we demand, or hiding behind others’ skirts…
• Freeports
  Maybe watered down by the Treasury but potentially with the ability to be a game-changer in the locations where they have been ‘licensed’. Already there’s evidence of investment decisions being made into the country that would not have otherwise have happened, including some projects that would have gone to ‘Brexit free’ Scotland but instead went south to England because of Freeports. If ever there was a message to Scots about Brexit, that should be it.
• Trade deals tailored to fit our export markets
  
  Ignore the doom-sayers. Of course most of the deals so far were ‘roll-overs’ – the need was to keep the current deals alive – but even those were previously said to be impossible by critics of Brexit. Yet the Japanese deal had additions that were new and the New Zealand and Australia deals are fresh. The media tries its best to look at the impact on British vested interests while ignoring the benefits to British consumers and exporters. More of these deals will in time become the norm…

• The freedom to introduce our own Covid vaccine before the rest of the EU
  
  Whatever you think of the vaccines – and we do not publish our views about them as that’s not our job – the reality is that the Oxford/Astra Zeneca vaccine would not have gained approval in time to be delivered by December 2020 had the UK Government not taken the decision to go with British drug approval (MHRA) without the EU agency oversight. Yes, that power always existed, but never would have a UK government have had the cojones to go it alone while inside the EU.

• Escaping the development of an EU military force to support EU Foreign Policy
  
  Well, we kept telling people and those like Nick Clegg kept denying it, but there has always been a very complicated and deceptive route – rather like Mao’s Long March – which looked like a Remainer retreat but was in fact destined to be the way to obtain control. That is the ability to have a military force that would add heft to EU Foreign Policy. Up until Theresa May fell from power this was still included the UK Government’s agenda. It no longer is, but there are still sleepers in the bureaucracy and parliament that we must guard against – is this the most important Brexit Bonus we never expected?

Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.

Brexit Facts4EU.Org, 30 Dec 2021

UK narrowly escapes two new climate change taxes and a new business tax – massive increase in EU’s budget

Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2021

A Facts4EU.Org analysis reveals the extent of the tax raid by Brussels

Just before Christmas, the EU Commission led by Ursula von der Leyen revealed its plans to raise enormous sums indirectly from EU citizens and directly from companies via a series of new taxes.

The Commission will get its 27 member countries to raise the taxes and will then take a proportion of them for its own budget in Brussels.

This plan flows from the huge indebtedness incurred by the EU itself, as a result of the various measures it announced last year, which it calls “NextGenerationEU”.

As the Commission itself stated on 22 Dec 2021:

Christmas present for Ursula von der Leyen and her fellow Brussels bureaucrats

Facts4EU.Org has analysed the details released by the Commission in an effort to summarise the staggering tax increases which now lie ahead for the EU – taxes which the UK population would have borne a disproportionately high share of, had the UK not voted to leave the EU in 2016.

Christmas, Covid-19…. but above all ‘climate change’

On 22 Dec 2021 the EU Commission issued a series of announcements, just as UK and EU citizens were making last minute preparations for Christmas and also trying to understand the latest COVID-19 restrictions on their freedoms which were being imposed by governments across the EU and in the UK.

The key pre-Christmas announcements from the Commission involve three new taxes which will bolster EU finances to the tune of some £320bn over five years, and which will continue after that. Two of the three new taxes relate to the ‘climate change’ policies of the EU Commission.

The top policy priority set out by the EU Commission led by Ursula von der Leyen was and remains her ‘Green Deal’. This goes ahead of all other priorities for the EU Commission’s programme until 2027. It is therefore not surprising that the lion’s share (76.5%) of the new taxes for the Commission will come from the two new ‘carbon taxes’.

But… but… Doesn’t the EU Commission have to have a balanced budget?

Until last year, in broad terms the EU’s expenditure had to be matched by its receipts. Its budget for the seven-year accounting period for 2021-2027 was agreed at more than €1 trillion (€1,074.3 billion). Last year, however, the Commission proposed a massive increase to enable it to distribute hundreds of billions of euros in response to the Covid crisis. This money all has to be borrowed.

The EU27 governments agreed that in response to Covid the EU should be allowed to borrow substantial sums of money on the international bond market. The result has been a massive indebtedness for the EU as an entity, which now affects all member countries. The EU Commission states:-

“NextGenerationEU – the temporary recovery instrument of around €800 billion in current prices – is at the heart of the EU response to the coronavirus crisis. To finance the recovery, the European Commission – on behalf of the EU – is borrowing on the capital markets.”

– EU Commission website, extracted 27 Dec 2021

It doesn’t end there

The number of ‘financial instruments’ being deployed by the EU Commission and the ECB is now so extensive it is beyond our means to summarise them effectively for the average reader. For example in its statement the EU Commission says:

“Furthermore, the Commission will present a proposal for a second basket of new own resources by the end of 2023. This second package will build on the ‘Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT)’ proposal foreseen for 2023.”

– EU Commission statement, 22 Dec 2021

Above we have shown the latest demands which are now being proposed by the EU Commission, to be inflicted on businesses and on the prices which EU citizens will have to pay for certain goods. As further information becomes available we will endeavour to report it to readers.

[ Sources: EU Commission ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.

Brexit Facts4EU.Org, Tues 28 Dec 2021

Click here to go to our news headlines

Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
And don’t forget to actually post your message after you have previewed it!

New Covid passport rules will override member states’ own laws

Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2021

Minimum of two vaccines and the ‘booster’ to be required for movement between ‘countries’ – and Member States cannot disallow entry

The EU Commission has announced that from 1st February 2022 anyone travelling between member states or entering the EU will be required to have a Covid Passport for both of the first two vaccines and the booster too.

Any EU citizen with a passport for both vaccines that does not include the booster will find it has expired – thus limiting their ability to travel within the EU to other member states from where they are at that time.

It will not be enough to have had only the vaccines and there will be no dispensation possible by showing a negative PCR or Lateral Flow test instead of the correct paperwork. It is the Vaccine Passport and nothing else.

Valid Vacine Passports will be time-limited to last exactly 270 days (essentially nine months) from the last dose, meaning that even valid vaccines or boosters will eventually need to be supplemented to stay active.

The EU27 ‘countries’ will be powerless in the face of Brussels’ rules

The new rules go further than before for they also prevent member states from making rules that are more or less onerous than the EU Commission’s. An individual member state will not be able to offer any relaxations for entry but also will not be able to deny entry to anyone who meets the EU’s own required standards.

In typical fashion the EU claims its Vaccine Passport is an unrivalled success without acknowledging that it creates a two tier authoritarian society – you either have the vaccine passport or you don’t – and it conveniently elevates the ‘booster’ to the same status as the vaccine.

[ Sources: EU Commission ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.

Brexit Facts4EU.Org, Christmas Eve, Fri 24 Dec 2021

Click here to go to our news headlines

Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
And don’t forget to actually post your message after you have previewed it!