Category: Uncategorized

  • EU’s illegal migrants per month have jumped 75% under Ursula von der Leyen

    104,000 asylum applications in Sept alone, and no end in sight

    Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2023

    Does the EU really have a “New Pact on Migration”? No, not yet
    And even if the EU’s new Pact is ratified, it will have no teeth

    Across the EU, migration is now a top issue for voters, just as in the UK. Yesterday (Thurs 21 Dec 2023) the EU Commission announced that asylum applications from illegal migrants had jumped to more than 100,000 in September alone.

    In Brussels the previous day, the EU Commission announced its new “New Pact on Migration and Asylum” to great fanfare. There were numerous statements and press conferences from different Commissioners, from the EU Commission President down.

    Going through the documentation, however, it is difficult to see anything which will dramatically reduce the flow of millions of illegal migrants into the EU – a proportion of whom will attempt to get to England.

    1. How badly have EU’s illegal migrant levels and asylum claims spiralled out of control?

    Brexit Facts4EU.Org Summary

    EU’s asylum claims from illegal migrants in last 10 years

    • Over 7.5m (7,563,770) applications in total
    • Numbers per month have almost doubled since Ursula von der Leyen became Commission President
    • In September alone they peaked at 104,000
    • Almost 100,000 of these were from new applicants – IN ONE MONTH

    [Source: EU Commission, 21 Dec 2023.]

    © Brexit Facts4EU.Org 2023 – click to enlarge

    2. What is contained in this new putative immigration pact?

    The EU’s putative pact contains very little of substance. Most of it contains worthy sentiments, without the backing of the practical measures needed to make a real difference to illegal migrant numbers. The preamble even seems to suggest an acceptance of the problem, saying :-

    “[The Pact] is designed to manage and normalise migration for the long term, providing certainty, clarity and decent conditions for people arriving in the EU. It also establishes a common approach to migration and asylum that is based on solidarity, responsibility, and respect for human rights.”

    – EU Commission, 20 Dec 2023

    The agreement covers five key proposals of the Pact:

    • Screening Regulation: Creating uniform rules concerning the identification of non-EU nationals upon their arrival, thus increasing the security within the Schengen area.
    • Eurodac Regulation: Developing a common database gathering more accurate and complete data to detect unauthorised movements.
    • Asylum Procedures Regulation: Making asylum, return and border procedures quicker and more effective.
    • Asylum Migration Management Regulation: Establishing a new solidarity mechanism amongst Member States to balance the current system, where a few countries are responsible for the vast majority of asylum applications, and clear rules on responsibility for asylum applications.
    • Crisis and Force majeure Regulation: Ensuring that the EU is prepared in the future to face situations of crisis, including instrumentalisation of migrants.

    There finally appears to be a deal to redistribute migrants across the bloc but this merely spreads the problem out, rather than stopping it. There is also a promise to increase the number of Frontex border staff, but this has already been done to little if no effect.

    In short, the Pact seeks to manage the effect of mass illegal immigration, without containing the tough measures required to stop it in the first place.

    3. The Rt Hon Robert Jenrick MP, former Immigration Minister, had this to say

    “The EU is resigned to illegal migration – their hollow words fool no-one”

    “This week ended with an agreement of sorts: the EU’s “New Pact on Migration and Asylum”. Cue much backslapping in Brussels. An ebullient Ylva Johansson, the European commissioner for home affairs declared: “We did it!”. I highly doubt the public will view it so fondly should they read its threadbare contents, nor history view it favourably.

    For all their talk of “intensifying the fight against smugglers” and providing a “European response” to a “European challenge”, the EU’s plan for tackling illegal migration is not worth the paper it’s written on.”

    The Rt Hon Robert Jenrick MP, writng in the Daily Telegraph, 22 Dec 2023

    4. As ever, the Commission announces ‘good news’ before it’s formally agreed

    It has taken more than three years to get to this meagre point and still nothing will be formally agreed until well into next year, if at all. This is a notional ‘political agreement’.

    As our Chairman often says: “The EU’s political agreements are generally not worth the hot air they’re written on.”

    Observations

    For many years we have been analysing the official data and reporting on the growing migrant crisis in the UK and across Europe. In the early days we risked being ‘shadow-banned’ by social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook – and indeed we were. Back then, even factual reporting such as ours on this subject laid us open to allegations of ‘racism’.

    This has never been about racism. It has always been about the protection of the public from terrorists who enter the UK illegally under the guise of ‘asylum seekers’ and about the appalling effect that overall mass immigration has had on the public’s quality of life in the United Kingdom.

    Today, this discussion is mainstream. As Robert Jenrick points out:-

    “The chronic inability of the EU to enforce its external borders will create deep political fissures within the bloc and terrible outcomes for EU citizens for decades to come.”

    “Despite incremental improvements, the French interception rate remains stubbornly low. Even as unseaworthy dinghies struggle in the Channel, the French navy adopts an extremely cautious approach to intervening, in stark contrast to their Belgian neighbours.”

    “Time and again, the EU has proven geopolitically impotent… we must confront the reality that nation states must act unilaterally when the vital national interest of border security is on the line.”

    Can you help us to keep going this Christmas?

    We need to raise around £200,000 to keep us going through next year, Every £5 donation from members of the public helps to reach this goal. Reports like the one above take far longer to research, write and produce than many people realise. If they were easy, readers would see other organisations also producing these daily. However, there’s little point in the Facts4EU.Org team working long hours, seven days-a-week, if we lack the resources to promote them effectively – to the public, to MPs, and to the media.

    We are a ‘not for profit’ team (we make a loss) and any payment goes towards the actual work, not plush London offices, lunch or taxi expenses, or other luxuries of some organisations.

    We badly need more of our thousands of readers to become members, to support our work. Could this be you, today? It’s quick and easy, we give you a choice of two highly secure payment providers, and we do NOT ask you for further support if you pay once. We just hope you keep supporting us. Your membership stays anonymous unless you tell us otherwise.

    Please don’t assume that other people will keep us going – we don’t receive enough to survive and we need your help today. Could you help us? We rely 100% on public contributions from readers like you.

    If you believe in a fully-free, independent, and sovereign United Kingdom, please join now by clicking on one of the links below or you can use our Support page here. You will receive a personal, friendly ‘thank you’ from a member of our team within 48 hours. Thank you.

    [ Sources: EU Commission | Robert Jenrick writing in the Daily Telegraph ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.

    Brexit Facts4EU.Org, Fri 22 Dec 2023

    Click here to go to our news headlines

    Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
    And don’t forget to actually post your message after you have previewed it!

    Share this article on

    Since before the EU Referendum, Brexit Facts4EU.Org
    has been the most prolific researcher and publisher of Brexit facts in the world.

    Supported by MPs, MEPs, & other groups, our work has impact.

    We think facts matter.
    Please donate today, so that we can continue to ensure a clean Brexit is finally delivered.

    Any credit card user

    Donate

    Subscribe

    Paypal Users Only – Choose amount first

  • Rwanda shock: EU signs €0.9bn deal with Rwandan government – Where’s the outrage?

    EU and UNHCR hypocrisy over Rwanda just grows and grows

    Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2023

    EU’s Ursula von der Leyen visits ‘unsafe’ Rwanda to do massive deal

    The EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen landed in Kigali, capital of Rwanda, on Monday (18 Dec 2023) to sign a deal “to take the EU-Rwanda partnership forward”, including investing more than €0.9 billion under Global Gateway, Europe’s investment programme. The two Presidents discussed investments in areas including health, critical raw materials, the agro-food industry, climate resilience and education.

    This is the same Rwanda which the UK’s Supreme Court deemed ‘unsafe’ to which to send illegal migrants for processing.

    Confidence in Rwanda

    One month ago (15 Nov 2023) the UK Supreme Court ruled the government’s Rwanda scheme – under which asylum seekers would be sent to Rwanda to have their claims decided there – to be unlawful. It stated that there were substantial grounds for believing that asylum seekers would face a real risk of ill-treatment by reason of refoulement to their country of origin if they were removed to Rwanda.

    © EU Commission 2023

    Despite this, just one month later the EU Commission President, personally attended the inauguration of a €150 million vaccine facility in Rwanda and announced a €40 million financial agreement with Rwanda, co-signing the deal in person with Rwanda’s President. Together with other funding the total comes to €0.9bn.

    The EU’s PR machine gave this news item top billing on the EU Commission Press Corner

    Speaking at the launch of the BioNTech facility, President Ursula von der Leyen said:

    (German) EU Commission President launches German investment in Rwanda

    “Local manufacturing of vaccines with mRNA technology, in Africa, for the African people, will be a game changer in the fight against diseases and pandemics. The EU is proud to work with Rwanda and BioNTech to develop a vibrant biopharmaceutical industry on the continent.

    – Keynote speech by President von der Leyen, BioNTech Africa Launch Ceremony, 18 Dec 2023

    German government also gives Rwanda a clean bill of health

    Germany’s foreign minister Annalena Baerbock also gave a keynote speech at the inauguration – BioNTech being a Germany company into which the German government poured €375 million funding in 2020. In the press release ahead of her trip to Rwanda, Annalena Baerbock stated:

    “Rwanda, one of the smallest countries in Africa in terms of landmass is already today often a model of development for an entire continent: with strong economic growth, as a pioneer in climate action and environmental protection, and as far as the social participation of women is concerned.”

    Arriving in the Rwandan capital, Kigali, on Monday (18 Dec 2023) at the inauguration of the BioNTech mRNA-based vaccine production facility, she said :

    “The BioNTainer production site we are opening today will be the nucleus of a Rwandan pharmaceutical sector and ecosystem. A sector that in the future will supply the African medical market at affordable prices. That will employ scientists from Rwanda and other African countries. And that will make us all safer.”

    – German Federal Foreign Office, 18 Dec 2023

    BioNTech is the German biotechnology company whose mRNA technology was used in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID vaccine.

    De rigueur, grandiose claims of EU largesse

    As usual, Ursula von der Leyen made grandiose claims of EU investment in Rwanda :-

    “The European Union and its Member States in a Team Europe approach are investing more than €900 million in Rwanda under Global Gateway, Europe’s investment programme for the world.”

    The sleight of hand is to tot up the investment of individual EU member states and label it “EU” investment by “Team Europe”.

    Background – Facts4EU.Org’s revelations regarding this safe country

    Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2023

    Two months ago we revealed that for years the EU has quietly been funding UNHCR flights of illegal migrants to Rwanda. The European Union announced a further €22 million support package this year for the Emergency Transit Mechanism (ETM) in Rwanda which is operated by UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, and the Government of Rwanda. In the UNHCR’s words :-

    “The ETM provides a life-saving channel to evacuate refugees and asylum seekers in need of international protection from Libya to Rwanda. While these individuals temporarily remain in Rwanda, the ETM provides shelter as well as access to health, psychosocial support, and livelihood trainings for evacuees during the processing of their files and identification of future solutions, including onward resettlement to third countries.”

    Since October, more EU countries interested in a Rwanda scheme

    Since our October report, the Austrian government has signed a “migration and security agreement” with the UK government to work on migration. Austria has been looking at a Rwanda-style deal to deport asylum seekers to a third country, and this weekend a leading German opposition politician, Jens Spahn, suggested sending asylum seekers from Germany to Rwanda, with a similar model to that proposed by the UK.

    Denmark had already passed a bill through its parliament in 2021, to facilitate the transfer of asylum processing and protection to a third country, and later drafted a memorandum of understanding with Rwanda to that effect.

    Observations

    Given that the BBC and other media have been full of headlines about Rishi Sunak’s Rwanda scheme, it might have been thought they would have covered this story. Unfortunately not. Facts4EU.Org felt that the double standards involved here merited a report. We end on a question for the Government.

    Why doesn’t the UK government make more of what it does in Rwanda?

    Did the UK government tell the UK Supreme Court judges about the following government policy document?

    “Politically, Rwanda has significant convening power and influence across Africa. Rwanda is current Chair-in-Office of the Commonwealth, plays a leading role in the African Union (AU), and is one of the biggest troop contributors to United Nations (UN) peacekeeping.

    “Rwanda continues to use development finance well, both in terms of results achieved and accountability for its use. Transparency International judges Rwanda among Africa’s least corrupt countries, while recent Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability and Auditor General assessments demonstrate a strong public financial management system. Effective governance remains one of the priority reform areas of NST1 [Rwanda’s National Strategy for Transformation].

    “The Rwandan Government prioritises good governance and accountability to citizens. The UK is assisting the Government through technical assistance on public finance management, and direct secondments of international experts – HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) tax advisers are embedded in the Rwandan Revenue Authority (RRA) and statistical experts from the UK Government’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) are embedded in the Rwandan National Institute for Statistics (NISR). We also support Rwandan civil society organisations through grants to support citizen engagement and accountability, advance human rights and support progress on freedom of expression.”

    – UK government policy document on Rwanda – July 2023

    We must get reports like this out there

    Reports like the one above take far longer to research, write and produce than many people realise. If they were easy, readers would see other organisations also producing these daily. However, there’s little point in the Facts4EU.Org team working long hours, seven days-a-week, if we lack the resources to promote them effectively – to the public, to MPs, and to the media. This is where you come in, dear reader.

    Facts4EU.Org needs you today

    We are a ‘not for profit’ team (we make a loss) and any payment goes towards the actual work, not plush London offices, lunch or taxi expenses, or other luxuries of some organisations.

    We badly need more of our thousands of readers to become members, to support this work. Could this be you, today? It’s quick and easy, we give you a choice of two highly secure payment providers, and we do NOT ask you for further support if you pay once. We just hope you keep supporting us. Your membership stays anonymous unless you tell us otherwise.

    Please don’t assume that other people will keep us going – we don’t receive enough to survive and we need your help today. Could you help us? We rely 100% on public contributions from readers like you.

    If you believe in a fully-free, independent, and sovereign United Kingdom, please join now by clicking on one of the links below or you can use our Support page here. You will receive a personal, friendly ‘thank you’ from a member of our team within 48 hours. Thank you.

    [ Sources: EU Commission | German Federal Government | UK Government ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.

    Brexit Facts4EU.Org, Thurs 21 Dec 2023

    Click here to go to our news headlines

    Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
    And don’t forget to actually post your message after you have previewed it!

    Share this article on

    Since before the EU Referendum, Brexit Facts4EU.Org
    has been the most prolific researcher and publisher of Brexit facts in the world.

    Supported by MPs, MEPs, & other groups, our work has impact.

    We think facts matter.
    Please donate today, so that we can continue to ensure a clean Brexit is finally delivered.

    Any credit card user

    Donate

    Subscribe

    Paypal Users Only – Choose amount first

  • Is the EU embarked on an end-of-year death spiral?

    Germany’s – and the EU’s – woes just keep piling up

    Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2023

    Precious little Christmas cheer in Berlin, Paris or Brussels this year

    As Christmas approaches, Facts4EU reports on the EU’s downward path to the festive season.

    NOTE: We are publishing this not out of ‘schadenfreude’ but because if what follows had related to the newly independent United Kingdom we are certain the BBC, Sky News, FT, Guardian and others would have found a way to attribute this to Brexit.

    The latest news out of the EU’s No.1 economy, Germany, continues to worsen as Christmas approaches. Not only that, but President Macron in France just lost his flagship migration policy when French legislators blocked it, the EU Parliament is mired in ever-increasing corruption scandals, and it seems that Brussels can’t get any of its member countries to agree on anything.

    It appears there is no let up of bad news for the EU, for its future, and for its major economies.

    1. EU’s No.1 economy falling deeper into recession?

    On Monday (18 Dec 2023) the respected German Ifo Institute published its December Business Climate Index on the German economy.
    Its headline was : “Business Climate Index Falls – Sentiment in German business has clouded over.”

    [Source: IFO, Munich 18 Dec 2023.]

    © Brexit Facts4EU.Org 2023 – click to enlarge

    The index fell to 86.4 in December. Analysts had expected a rise so this was doubly disappointing.

    “Companies were less satisfied with their current business. They were also more sceptical about the first half of 2024. As the year draws to a close, the German economy remains weak.

    “In manufacturing, the Business Climate Index fell noticeably. Companies assessed their current business situation as significantly worse. Their expectations also grew more pessimistic. Energy-intensive industries are having a particularly tough time. Order books continue to shrink overall.”

    “In restaurants and catering, the business situation improved but expectations took a nose-dive.

    “In trade, the business climate suffered a setback. Companies assessed their current situation as markedly worse. Their expectations also darkened.

    “For retailers, holiday trade is disappointing this year. In construction, the Business Climate Index fell to its lowest level since September 2005. Companies assessed their current situation as worse. “Moreover, roughly one in two companies are expecting business to deteriorate further in the months ahead.”

    – Clemens Fuest, President of the Ifo Institute, Munich, 18 Dec 2023

    © Brexit Facts4EU.Org 2023 – click to enlarge

    2. Macron’s migrants – no end in sight for the French President

    Meanwhile in the EU’s No.2 economy, the French President’s migration strategy was shot down in flames last week when French MPs blocked his proposed new law. In addition there are now near riots in French schools from Islamist pupils, two teachers have been murdered, and the lack of immigrant integration predominantly in the cities across France is increasingly causing alarm.

    President Macron’s approval ratings amongst the French public are now at a record low.

    3. EU Parliament – the corruption scandals grow and grow

    On the back of Brussels police finding suitcases full of hundreds of thousands of Euros allegedly given to MEPs by the Qatari government or its agencies, there are now many more allegations of corruption in the EU Parliament involving Qatar and Morocco, amongst others. This looks likely to run and run.

    4. The EU Commission – no agreement on migration (after many years), Ukraine, or much else

    With a rapidly-escalating migration crisis on its hands, Ursula von der Leyen’s Commission has been unable to agree a coordinated immigration policy with the 27 member countries. This has now been dragging on for many years, as we have reported previously.

    Meanwhile Italy has seen a trebling in the numbers of illegal boat migrants in the last two years, and over 200 German mayors have said they can’t cope with any more migrants in their jurisdictions.

    © Brexit Facts4EU.Org 2023 – click to enlarge

    Observations

    We go back to what we wrote at the top of this report. If what we have reported had related to the newly independent United Kingdom we are certain the BBC, Sky News, FT, Guardian and others would have found a way to attribute this to Brexit.

    The simple fact is that all is not well in the EU. All across the EU there is dissatisfaction and a movement to the right from ordinary voters. This has been shown in several recent general elections in different countries, as we have reported.

    In Germany, support for the right-wing AfD party has soared and an AfD mayor was elected in a major German town for the first time last week. Right-wing governments are becoming commonplace. In France, Marine le Pen has a good chance in the next Presidential elections.

    When it comes to the EU as a body, there is little enthusiasm for Ursula von der Leyen’s Commission. Just as she was unpopular as German Defence Minister, it seems that her abilities as head of the Commission – where she was parachuted in at the last minute by Angela Merkel – are not going down well.

    All we can say is that we genuinely wish all our European friends a very happy Christmas.

    We must get reports like this out there

    Reports like the one above take far longer to research, write and produce than many people realise. If they were easy, readers would see other organisations also producing these daily. However, there’s little point in the Facts4EU.Org team working long hours, seven days-a-week, if we lack the resources to promote them effectively – to the public, to MPs, and to the media. This is where you come in, dear reader.

    Facts4EU.Org needs you today

    We are a ‘not for profit’ team (we make a loss) and any payment goes towards the actual work, not plush London offices, lunch or taxi expenses, or other luxuries of some organisations.

    We badly need more of our thousands of readers to become members, to support this work. Could this be you, today? It’s quick and easy, we give you a choice of two highly secure payment providers, and we do NOT ask you for further support if you pay once. We just hope you keep supporting us. Your membership stays anonymous unless you tell us otherwise.

    Please don’t assume that other people will keep us going – we don’t receive enough to survive and we need your help today. Could you help us? We rely 100% on public contributions from readers like you.

    If you believe in a fully-free, independent, and sovereign United Kingdom, please join now by clicking on one of the links below or you can use our Support page here. You will receive a personal, friendly ‘thank you’ from a member of our team within 48 hours. Thank you.

    [ Sources: IFO | French government | German Federal statistics agency | Ministero dell’Interno Italy ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.

    Brexit Facts4EU.Org, Wed 20 Dec 2023

    Click here to go to our news headlines

    Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
    And don’t forget to actually post your message after you have previewed it!

    Share this article on

    Since before the EU Referendum, Brexit Facts4EU.Org
    has been the most prolific researcher and publisher of Brexit facts in the world.

    Supported by MPs, MEPs, & other groups, our work has impact.

    We think facts matter.
    Please donate today, so that we can continue to ensure a clean Brexit is finally delivered.

    Any credit card user

    Donate

    Subscribe

    Paypal Users Only – Choose amount first

  • EXCLUSIVE : Almost 200,000 excess deaths since the COVID lockdowns started

    And over 28,000 more people have died so far this year, compared to the 5-year average

    Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2023

    The Covid Public Inquiry won’t tell us about this, so Facts4EU.Org and CIBUK.Org have investigated

    In this exclusive report in our end-of-year 2023 series on lessons learnt from COVID-19 we show that over 28,000 more people have died so far this year compared to the five-year average. This is despite the fact that only 1% of all deaths are now due to COVID-19.

    Additionally we can reveal that almost 200,000 more people have died than would be expected since lockdowns started. We also have alarming testimony to us from a top oncologist suggesting that we’re only seeing the tip of the iceberg.

    The reason for the excess deaths appears to be that whilst COVID-19 was undoubtedly a cause for some of these, lockdowns have played a significant part – and this effect looks likely to grow. We will comment on this further. Unfortunately the devolved administrations of Scotland and Northern Ireland are way behind with their figures as usual, so our report refers only to England and Wales.

    Brexit Facts4EU.Org Summary

    Deaths registered in England and Wales, week ending 01 December 2023

    • 28,261 more people have died this year than expected
    • This amounts to 5.6% of total deaths in this year
    • This large rise is not due to COVID-19

    [Source : Office for National Statistics, 12 Dec 2023.]

    © Brexit Facts4EU.Org 2023 – click to enlarge

    It gets much worse… almost 200,000 excess deaths since lockdowns started

    • 2,197,460 total deaths 23 Mar 2020 to 10 Dec 2023
    • 197,919 excess deaths above 5-year average

    [Source : Office for National Statistics, 12 Dec 2023.]

    © Brexit Facts4EU.Org 2023 – click to enlarge

    We asked a senior oncologist to comment on our analysis

    Comments on our report, by Professor Karol Sikora, eminent senior oncologist

    “We are going to continue to see a significant number of excess deaths across a wide age range simply caused by poor access to healthcare during the Covid years. Rather than wasting time on bickering politicians, the Hallett Inquiry needs to conduct a detailed analysis of their cause.

    “It’s likely that the excess mortality from different diseases – stroke, ischaemic heart disease and the four common cancers will peak at different times and have different patterns of duration. For cancer, I predict that lung cancer excess mortality will peak first in 2025 followed by colon and breast cancer a year later. Prostate is a slower growing disease and so the post-Covid peak will be around 2028.

    “The average age of all these deaths will be significantly younger than those from Covid at over 82 years.”

    Professor Sikora studied medical science and biochemistry at Cambridge, where he obtained a double first. After clinical training he became a house physician at The Middlesex Hospital and registrar in oncology at St Bartholomew’s Hospital. He later became a research student at the MRC Laboratory for Molecular Biology in Cambridge working with Nobel Prize winner, Dr Sydney Brenner. He obtained his PhD and became a clinical fellow at Stanford University, California before returning to direct the Ludwig Institute in Cambridge. He has been Clinical Director for Cancer Services at Hammersmith for 12 years and established a major cancer research laboratory there funded by the Imperial Cancer Research Fund of which he became Deputy Director (Clinical Research). From 1997 to 2002 he was Chief of the WHO Cancer Program.

    Professor Sikora has published over 300 papers and written or edited 20 books and is on the editorial board of several journals and is the founding editor of Gene Therapy and Cancer Strategy. He was a member of the UK Health Department’s Expert Advisory Group on Cancer (the Calman-Hine Committee), the Committee on Safety of Medicines and remains an adviser to the WHO.

    Excess deaths and lockdowns

    There are now clear signs of a substantial increase in deaths well after COVID-19 ceased to be a major issue in the United Kingdom. In this report we try to get to the bottom of this by analysing the raw data, despite the lack of transparency from the COVID Public Inquiry, the ONS, NICE, or the Government.

    Many readers will be aware of articles now appearing, regarding what are known as “excess deaths”. These are deaths which are over and above what would be expected each year, based on the five-year average pre-COVID. On behalf of CIBUK.Org, the Facts4EU.Org think-tank has drilled down into what official data is available, in order to present the relevant facts to our readers, to MPs, to the media, and to the public.

    Deaths “due to Covid-19” are now at just 1.0% of total deaths

    As we have reported many times, the overall numbers of deaths each year completely dwarf the number of deaths allegedly “due to Covid”. It remains the case that these are misreported.

    In the week ending 01 December 2023 (Week 48), 11,328 deaths were registered in England and Wales. The ONS continues to report on deaths where COVID-19 was “mentioned” and states these were “1.6% of all deaths”. To give readers some idea of how erroneous this is, we shall give readers the true numbers.

    Brexit Facts4EU.Org Summary

    Deaths in the last week

    • 177 of these 11,328 deaths mentioned COVID-19, supposedly accounting for 1.6% of all deaths
    • However only 116 deaths had COVID-19 recorded as the underlying cause of death
    • The true percentage of all deaths actually due to COVID-19 was therefore 1.0%

    [Source: Latest ONS official data, released Sat 12 Dec 2023.]

    © Brexit Facts4EU.Org 2023 – click to enlarge

    What really is a Coronavirus death?

    It is a fact that the Office for National Statistics continues to use the following definition. What follows comes from the ONS website today :-

    “Coronavirus (COVID-19) deaths are those deaths registered in England and Wales in the stated week where COVID-19 was mentioned on the death certificate. A doctor can certify the involvement of COVID-19 based on symptoms and clinical findings; a positive test result is not required.”

    – ONS, 18 Dec 2023

    In other words, a person can be rushed to hospital with a heart attack, and – even if he isn’t tested for COVID but a doctor ‘mentions it’ on the death certificate – the ONS will count him (or her) in the COVID-19 deaths.

    In Part III we will conclude by attempting a ‘cost-benefit analysis’ of lockdowns, based on the universally-accepted measure known as ‘QALY’s’ – “Quality Adjusted Life Years”.

    Observations

    There are many questions that the Covid Inquiry should be asking – but aren’t. They seem more interested in the tittle-tattle of politicking than in addressing the questions that really matter.

    If we all take a step back, what we really want to know is whether the lockdowns – which have so decimated our economy and which caused so much misery to millions – were worth all the costs on so many levels. There are of course other serious questions, such as the policy of sending elderly hospital patients back into care homes.

    Critically, why wasn’t the globally-accepted QALY system (of assessing the value of interventions and treatments against their costs) used by ‘Pinky and Perky’ when they lectured us nightly on the TV? In a world where resources are limited, physicians and regulators such as NICE are forced to make tough decisions all the time. The QALY system may not be ideal but it’s the best we have.

    This will be the subject of our final analysis in Part III. We would like to know whether the response to COVID-19 by our government, by the NHS hierarchy, by SAGE, and by others, was reasonable and proportionate in order to deliver the best possible overall outcome for the British people. If not, how do we do better next time?

    We must get reports like this out there

    Reports like the one above take far longer to research, write and produce than many people realise. If they were easy, readers would see other organisations also producing these daily. However, there’s little point in the Facts4EU.Org team working long hours, seven days-a-week, if we lack the resources to promote them effectively – to the public, to MPs, and to the media. This is where you come in, dear reader.

    Facts4EU.Org needs you today

    We are a ‘not for profit’ team (we make a loss) and any payment goes towards the actual work, not plush London offices, lunch or taxi expenses, or other luxuries of some organisations.

    We badly need more of our thousands of readers to become members, to support this work. Could this be you, today? It’s quick and easy, we give you a choice of two highly secure payment providers, and we do NOT ask you for further support if you pay once. We just hope you keep supporting us. Your membership stays anonymous unless you tell us otherwise.

    Please don’t assume that other people will keep us going – we don’t receive enough to survive and we need your help today. Could you help us? We rely 100% on public contributions from readers like you.

    If you believe in a fully-free, independent, and sovereign United Kingdom, please join now by clicking on one of the links below or you can use our Support page here. You will receive a personal, friendly ‘thank you’ from a member of our team within 48 hours. Thank you.

    [ Sources: Office for National Statistics | Professor Karol Sikora ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.

    Brexit Facts4EU.Org, Tues 19 Dec 2023

    Click here to go to our news headlines

    Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
    And don’t forget to actually post your message after you have previewed it!

    Share this article on

    Since before the EU Referendum, Brexit Facts4EU.Org
    has been the most prolific researcher and publisher of Brexit facts in the world.

    Supported by MPs, MEPs, & other groups, our work has impact.

    We think facts matter.
    Please donate today, so that we can continue to ensure a clean Brexit is finally delivered.

    Any credit card user

    Donate

    Subscribe

    Paypal Users Only – Choose amount first

  • “It’s behind you!” – The Covid-19 inquiry is nothing more than an expensive Christmas pantomime

    Boris nails it and the lawyers should be sent home for an extended holiday

    Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2023

    Our analysis demolishes the allegation that the UK had “the second-worst excess deaths in Europe”

    In his evidence to the Covid enquiry a week last Wednesday, former PM the Rt Hon Boris Johnson tried in vain to introduce some real and relevant evidence from which we could all learn. Sadly – but predictably, alas – he was shut down by the barrister leading the questioning.

    Our report today focuses on one question: “Was the UK really the second-worst in Europe for excess deaths?”

    Brexit Facts4EU.Org Summary

    How did the UK compare to the rest of Europe on Covid-19?

    Relative cumulative age-standardised mortality rates

    The King’s Counsel at the inquiry said the UK was the second-worst for excess deaths in Europe

    • He said “almost all other Western European countries had a lower level of excess death”
    • In fact the UK was 15th out of 29 – just below the mid-point
    • This KC has not yet corrected the gross falsehood

    On 20 December 2022 the Office for National Statistics published the latest data on comparisons for excess deaths in Europe. It was called “Comparisons of all-cause excess mortality on a weekly basis since the start of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Measures include relative age-standardised mortality rates and relative cumulative age-standardised mortality rates.” It runs up to mid-2022 (week 26) as this was the last week for which international data was complete.

    We analysed this data and here are the results :-

    Relative cumulative age-standardised mortality rates, persons, all ages, week ending 03 January 2020 to 01 July 2022 (week 26 2022), European countries

    [Source : Office for National Statistics, 20 Dec 2022, latest report available.]

    © Brexit Facts4EU.Org 2023 – click to enlarge

    Below we present what was actually said

    Transcript of public inquiry, testimony of Boris Johnson, 06 Dec 2023

    The following exchange shows just how little the inquiry’s very expensive legal team, led by Hugo Keith KC, actually knows. Given that he is a very highly paid barrister, we must say no more.

    Boris Johnson: “And the evidence that I’ve seen suggests that we were well down the European table and well down the world table. Though that is of course no comfort to the bereaved and their families, that seems to be the statistical reality.

    Hugo Keith KC: “The evidence before my Lady is that the United Kingdom had one of the highest rates of excess death in Europe, almost all other Western European countries had a lower level of excess death.

    Boris Johnson: “Not that I’ve seen.

    Hugo Keith KC: “Italy was, tragically, in a worse position than the United Kingdom.

    Boris Johnson: “Well, I don’t wish to contradict you, Mr Keith, but the evidence – the ONS data I saw put us, I think, about 16th or 19th in a table of 33.

    [Facts4EU note: This had the UK, England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland in the list, so Boris was right with his first statement. In our chart above we have shown the UK as a whole, at No.15. This is a long way from the UK being the second-worst in Europe, as Mr Keith claimed.]

    Hugo Keith KC: “In Western Europe, we were one of the worst off, if not the second worst off. You must have long reflected since that time why that was so. Why do you think that we had the rate of excess deaths in this country that we did ultimately have?

    Boris Johnson: “As I say, I think that the statistics vary, and I think that the – every country struggled with a new pandemic, and I think the UK, from the evidence that I have seen, was well down the European table and obviously even further down the world table.

    Simply not good enough

    It must be said that readers would expect an experienced and extremely highly-paid King’s Counsel, backed by the phalanx of his large legal team, to get his basic facts correct when questioning the former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. Unfortunately he did not just get these facts wrong, he then continued with his false narrative. At no point did he correct the record.

    It was in fact Boris Johnson who had a better handle on the facts than the inquiry’s lead investigator.

    Sadly, the KC then went on to compound his ignorance when the current occupant of No.10, Rishi Sunak, tried to raise the question of ‘QALY’s’ which are used all over the world to measure the costs and benefits of any measures to deal with health matters. This was simply appalling and it is a subject we shall come back to.

    Observations

    The Christmas pantomime

    It is now absolutely clear that this enquiry is not and never has been fit for purpose. Its conclusions will be of no use in learning lessons in order to better manage any future ‘pandemic’.

    It is our contention that this Christmas pantomime should be shut down immediately and that all the very expensive battalions of lawyers be sent away ‘to spend more time with their families’.

    Apocalypse now – and then

    In the mass hysteria engendered by the BBC, Sky News, and ITN on a daily basis as Covid-19 started to affect people in 2020, the public was bombarded in what must now be seen as a gross misinformation campaign which was neither balanced nor helpful.

    We looked on in dismay, until we could stand it no longer and stopped watching. Now we have a public inquiry which is at best painful to watch and at worst entirely pointless. It clearly has no interest in learning lessons from the over-reaction to Covid-19. It has no interest in the massive excess deaths occurring as a result of lockdowns. And it has no interest in the consequential damage to our economy, our young people, people’s mental health, and on our society overall.

    This shambolic nonsense should be put out of of its misery before Christmas and all the lawyers will then have extended time to spend with their families this Christmas… and beyond.

    Our next report in this series will be on the reality of excess deaths since lockdowns started.

    Facts4EU.Org needs YOU this weekend

    We are a ‘not for profit’ team (we make a loss) and any payment from readers goes towards the actual work, not plush London offices, lunch or taxi expenses, or other luxuries of some organisations.

    We badly need more of our thousands of readers to become members, to support our work. Could this be you, today? It’s quick and easy, we give you a choice of two highly secure payment providers, and we do NOT ask you for further support if you pay once. We just hope you keep supporting us. Your membership stays anonymous unless you tell us otherwise.

    Please don’t assume that other people will keep us going – we don’t receive enough to survive and we need your help today. Could you help us? We rely 100% on public contributions from readers like you.

    If you believe in a fully-free, independent, and sovereign United Kingdom, please join now by clicking on one of the links below or you can use our Support page here. You will receive a personal, friendly ‘thank you’ from a member of our team within 48 hours. Thank you.

    [ Sources: Covid Inquiry | ONS ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.

    Brexit Facts4EU.Org, Sun 17 Dec 2023

    Click here to go to our news headlines

    Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
    And don’t forget to actually post your message after you have previewed it!

    Share this article on

    Since before the EU Referendum, Brexit Facts4EU.Org
    has been the most prolific researcher and publisher of Brexit facts in the world.

    Supported by MPs, MEPs, & other groups, our work has impact.

    We think facts matter.
    Please donate today, so that we can continue to ensure a clean Brexit is finally delivered.

    Any credit card user

    Donate

    Subscribe

    Paypal Users Only – Choose amount first

  • Cancer mortality is worse in the TOP 3 EU countries than in the UK

    It’s bad in the UK, but there are worse places in Europe to have cancer

    Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2023

    Facts4EU.Org shines a light on the UK’s record on cancer, compared to the EU

    There are four big killers in the UK: cancer, heart disease, flu, pneumonia, etc, and dementia. And no, Covid doesn’t appear in the Top Four. This report has been collated by a member of the Brexit Facts4EU.Org team fighting off the top killer, and who therefore is very empathetic with all readers in the same boat.

    “Cancer is the defining health issue of our time. Avoiding thousands of cancer deaths is possible, but it will take leadership, political will, investment and reform.

    “The impact of cancer is immense. We estimate that half a million people – friends, colleagues and loved ones – will be diagnosed with the disease every year by 2040. Their lives are at stake if we don’t act now.”

    – Michelle Mitchell, Chief Executive of Cancer Research UK, 28 Nov 2023

    In its latest report released on 28 Nov 2023, Cancer Research UK estimates that around half a million new cancer cases each year are expected by 2040. This means there will be almost no-one in the UK who will be unaffected. Nearly everyone will know someone – a colleague, a friend or a loved one – with a cancer diagnosis.

    The good news is that survival rates for many types of cancer have improved dramatically in recent decades. The bad news is that the obsession with COVID-19 meant that early diagnosis – which is so important – has resulted in many people going undiagnosed.

    How does the UK compare with other countries?

    Cancer Research UK says “Patients are waiting longer than ever for diagnosis and treatment – this is unacceptable when a matter of weeks can be enough for some cancers to progress.”

    Facts4EU.Org asked them for the data they have on international comparisons but this was not forthcoming. We therefore did our own research of the official data, comparing the United Kingdom with the European Union. Unexpectedly we found that despite all the negativity the UK does well by comparison.

    Brexit Facts4EU.Org Summary

    Cancer mortality rates – EU and UK

    Deaths per 100,000 in population

    © Brexit Facts4EU.Org 2023 – click to enlarge

    [Sources: EU Commission and OECD, data for 2020.]

    In 2020, 2.7 million people in the European Union were diagnosed with cancer, and another 1.3 million people lost their lives to it, including over 2,000 young people. The EU Commission is investing €4 billion of funding into its ‘Cancer Beating Programme’. Cancer Research UK is now calling on the UK Government to commit to its own ‘Manifesto for cancer research and care’ .

    “Almost 1 in 2 of us will get cancer in our lifetimes, and all of us will be affected by it. More years of healthy life are lost to premature mortality or disability because of cancer than any other disease.”

    – Cancer Research UK, 28 Nov 2023

    Cancer diagnosis and targets missed

    There is no question that a cancer diagnosis is a very unpleasant experience, as a member of our team can testify. Equally, it is well-known that the obsession with COVID-19 meant that many diagnoses were simply not made during 2020 and 2021, which is likely to have very bad effects on the prospects of people who are being diagnosed late in the day.

    Here are the latest results in England for September 2023, according to Cancer Research UK. (The other UK nations report separately and with a delay.)

    Urgent suspected cancer referrals standard: Target Missed

    • 74% of people were seen by a specialist within 2 weeks of an urgent suspected cancer referral in September 2023. Target : 93%

    The Faster Diagnosis Standard: Target Missed

    • 69.7% of people were diagnosed, or had cancer ruled out, within 28 days of an urgent referral in September 2023. Target : 75%

    The 62-day standard: Target Missed

    • Only 59.3% of people in England received their diagnosis and started their first treatment within 2 months of an urgent referral in September 2023. Target : 85%

    The 31-day standard: Target Missed

    • 9.7% of people started treatment within 31 days of doctors deciding a treatment plan in September 2023. Target : 96%

    Observations

    The main cause of death in England and Wales is cancer

    Around 580,000 people die every year in England and Wales. This is just a fact of life (and of death). This summary collates information from the Office for National Statistics from Jan 2020. There is no simple official summary available because for some reason they split out each form of cancer separately so we have analysed and summarised the data. This clearly shows that cancer, heart disease, ‘flu, and ‘dementia/Alzheimers have been the biggest killers since Jan 2020.

    Note: The data in relation to “deaths due to Covid” is highly suspect, as we have pointed out before. This is primarily because Covid was mentioned on death certificates even when the primary cause was something else. If someone tested positive for Covid then it was put on the death certificate, regardless of the main cause of death.

    We must get reports like this out there

    Reports like the one above take far longer to research, write and produce than many people realise. If they were easy, readers would see other organisations also producing these daily. However, there’s little point in the Facts4EU.Org team working long hours, seven days-a-week, if we lack the resources to promote them effectively – to the public, to MPs, and to the media. This is where you come in, dear reader.

    Facts4EU.Org needs you today

    We are a ‘not for profit’ team (we make a loss) and any payment goes towards the actual work, not plush London offices, lunch or taxi expenses, or other luxuries of some organisations.

    We badly need more of our thousands of readers to become members, to support this work. Could this be you, today? It’s quick and easy, we give you a choice of two highly secure payment providers, and we do NOT ask you for further support if you pay once. We just hope you keep supporting us. Your membership stays anonymous unless you tell us otherwise.

    Please don’t assume that other people will keep us going – we don’t receive enough to survive and we need your help today. Could you help us? We rely 100% on public contributions from readers like you.

    If you believe in a fully-free, independent, and sovereign United Kingdom, please join now by clicking on one of the links below or you can use our Support page here. You will receive a personal, friendly ‘thank you’ from a member of our team within 48 hours. Thank you.

    [ Sources: EU Commission | OECD | Cancer Research UK ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.

    Brexit Facts4EU.Org, Mon 18 Dec 2023

    Click here to go to our news headlines

    Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
    And don’t forget to actually post your message after you have previewed it!

    Share this article on

    Since before the EU Referendum, Brexit Facts4EU.Org
    has been the most prolific researcher and publisher of Brexit facts in the world.

    Supported by MPs, MEPs, & other groups, our work has impact.

    We think facts matter.
    Please donate today, so that we can continue to ensure a clean Brexit is finally delivered.

    Any credit card user

    Donate

    Subscribe

    Paypal Users Only – Choose amount first

  • EXCLUSIVE : UK is world’s biggest donor for the UN’s humanitarian aid projects

    UN chief pleads for extra $46bn – how much of this will the UK stump up?

    Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2023

    The UK has been the world’s biggest funder of the UN’s humanitarian aid work

    EXCLUSIVE : On Monday (11 Dec 2023) the UN’s ‘Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator’ delivered a speech in Doha, Qatar, appealing for $46 billion in emergency funding for next year (2024).

    Putting aside that Martin Griffiths made this speech in Qatar, which is now fully embroiled in bribery and corruption allegations involving members of the EU Parliament, what is less well-known is that the United Kingdom has been the biggest donor to United Nations humanitarian projects for the last 18 years since it was founded.

    Today we can reveal the generosity of the British taxpayer to the UN

    Credit : UN OCHA 2023

    Brexit Facts4EU.Org Summary

    Top 10 donors to UN (OHCA) humanitarian relief programmes 2006-2023

    • United Kingdom : $4.56 bn
    • Germany : $2.66 bn
    • Sweden : $2.19 bn
    • Netherlands : $2.01 bn
    • Norway : $1.50 bn
    • Denmark : $0.74 bn
    • Canada : $0.69 bn
    • Ireland : $0.68 bn
    • Belgium : $0.65 bn
    • Switzerland : $0.37 bn
    • All others : $2.13 bn

    [Source : UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).]

    © Brexit Facts4EU.Org 2023 – click to enlarge

    The United Kingdom has donated far more to the UN’s humanitarian projects than the United States. Note: This does not include bilateral assistance.

    “The UK is investing $1.2 billion in effective humanitarian systems” : UK statement at the UN General Assembly on Friday

    On Friday (08 Dec 2023) the UK’s Ambassador to the UN, James Kariuki, gave an address to the UN General Assembly meeting on humanitarian aid. In his speech he said the following :-

    “First, we will invest in an effective humanitarian system. We will contribute $1.2 billion to humanitarian assistance from 2024 to 2025. And we will also establish a UK Humanitarian Crisis Response Fund for specialist technical expertise, search and rescue, and emergency medical teams.”

    – Deputy Permanent Representative, UK Mission to the UN, New York (UK Ambassador to the UN), James Kariuki, 08 Dec 2023

    The burgeoning United Nations organisation

    With nigh-on 200 member countries and ‘micro-states’, and more than 150 agencies and divisions, the UN has become ever larger over the years. It now directly employs over 125,000 people worldwide. With the thousands of other organisations it subcontracts work to, we believe it is responsible for a workworce in seven figures.

    In the chart below we are only showing direct employees. Each of the 150+ agencies naturally requires a management tier, so one can only wonder at the duplication.

    Brexit Facts4EU.Org Summary

    The ever-increasing size of the United Nations organisation

    © Brexit Facts4EU.Org 2023 – click to enlarge

    [Source: Latest UN HR Dept, 13 Dec 2023.]

    The UN official asking for $46bn is British

    The British UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator

    The Emergency Relief Coordinator (ERC) is the most senior UN official dedicated to humanitarian affairs. The ERC reports directly to the United Nations Secretary-General and serves as a focal point for governments, intergovernmental, and non-governmental organizations on humanitarian issues. In this capacity the ERC is often called before the UN Security Council in response to humanitarian emergencies.

    Martin Griffiths – as far as we can see – has never held what might be called “a normal job” in his life. He has, however, done very well in the United Nations and similar organisations over many years.

    Mr Griffiths was the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoy for Yemen, the first Executive Director of the European Institute of Peace, and an adviser to all three of the UN Secretary-General’s Special Envoys for Syria. He has also worked in the UK’s FCDO and for various international humanitarian organizations, including UNICEF, Save the Children and Action Aid. In 1994, he became the Director of the Department of Humanitarian Affairs in Geneva and served as Deputy to the UN Emergency Relief Coordinator in New York from 1998 to 1999. He has also served as the UN Regional Humanitarian Coordinator for the Great Lakes and in the Balkans.

    The work of this organisation

    The organisation’s current priority is Gaza. It also has current campaigns for Sudan, ‘climate adaptation’, and ‘investing in women’s expertise’.

    Observations

    It is pefectly possible that the British taxpayer is happy to have given £4 billion pounds to the United Nations’ two main funds for humanitarian aid over the last 18 years. It is equally possible that they don’t mind the UK having given 42% more than the EU’s largest economy, Germany.

    We do, however, believe in the principle of ‘informed consent’. This is why we have provided the analysis above. The UN has become a bloated, bureaucratic organisation with so many agencies it would be inmpossible to list them all in a report such as this. (Although we do have the list.)

    Its leaders now seem to be elected on the basis of ‘Buggin’s turn’. In other words each continent must take it in turns to promote its people into the leadership positions. This happens regardless of competence or indeed of these countries’ position on matters such as human rights, democracy, or other principles which the UK signed up to decades ago, on its founding.

    We must get reports like this out there

    Reports like the one above take far longer to research, write and produce than many people realise. If they were easy, readers would see other organisations also producing these daily. However, there’s little point in the Facts4EU.Org team working long hours, seven days-a-week, if we lack the resources to promote them effectively – to the public, to MPs, and to the media. This is where you come in, dear reader.

    Facts4EU.Org needs you today

    We are a ‘not for profit’ team (we make a loss) and any payment goes towards the actual work, not plush London offices, lunch or taxi expenses, or other luxuries of some organisations.

    We badly need more of our thousands of readers to become members, to support this work. Could this be you, today? It’s quick and easy, we give you a choice of two highly secure payment providers, and we do NOT ask you for further support if you pay once. We just hope you keep supporting us. Your membership stays anonymous unless you tell us otherwise.

    Please don’t assume that other people will keep us going – we don’t receive enough to survive and we need your help today. Could you help us? We rely 100% on public contributions from readers like you.

    If you believe in a fully-free, independent, and sovereign United Kingdom, please join now by clicking on one of the links below or you can use our Support page here. You will receive a personal, friendly ‘thank you’ from a member of our team within 48 hours. Thank you.

    [ Sources: UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs | Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.

    Brexit Facts4EU.Org, Wed 13 Dec 2023

    Click here to go to our news headlines

    Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
    And don’t forget to actually post your message after you have previewed it!

    Share this article on

    Since before the EU Referendum, Brexit Facts4EU.Org
    has been the most prolific researcher and publisher of Brexit facts in the world.

    Supported by MPs, MEPs, & other groups, our work has impact.

    We think facts matter.
    Please donate today, so that we can continue to ensure a clean Brexit is finally delivered.

    Any credit card user

    Donate

    Subscribe

    Paypal Users Only – Choose amount first

  • In Memoriam

    Robert Kimbell, R.I.P.

    It is with great regret that on Thursday we learnt of the passing of Robert Kimbell. His Twitter account says it all.

    “Optimist. Brexiteer. Extensively travelled. British. Never knowingly under-researched.”

    It is in the nature of the man that he was still posting to his 100,000 followers on Twitter (‘X’) until a few days before his death.

    Our Chairman had this to say :

    “A champion for liberty in every way, Robert was a tireless campaigner and produced an endless stream of positive news researched assiduously from official sources in the UK and worldwide. His work was simply extraordinary and he was a legend out there on social media. I am proud to have been able to call him a friend.

    “Robert, I shall miss you.”

    “The United Kingdom has lost one of its great sons.”

    Share this article on

    Since before the EU Referendum, Brexit Facts4EU.Org
    has been the most prolific researcher and publisher of Brexit facts in the world.

    Supported by MPs, MEPs, & other groups, our work has impact.

    We think facts matter.
    Please donate today, so that we can continue to ensure a clean Brexit is finally delivered.

    Any credit card user

    Donate

    Subscribe

    Paypal Users Only – Choose amount first

  • Don’t get stuffed by the EU’s poor food safety standards this Christmas

    Pork sausage in your stuffing this Christmas? Make sure you don’t buy it from the EU

    Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2023

    Following our revelations yesterday, here’s a reminder of why it’s safer to buy British food

    With many families starting to stock up for Christmas today, we bring tidings of… well, not exactly comfort and joy, but perhaps some good cheer if you’re British.

    Yesterday we revealed the appalling animal safety standards in the EU and how the Commission says it will soon act to improve these. Today we remind readers of our research in 2020 on the serious health dangers in buying pork products from EU27 countries – including pork sausage meat for your turkey stuffing.

    This is yet another example of why you and your family are much safer “buying British” this Christmas.

    Forget chlorinated chicken, new EU rules mean feeding us “abscesses, pus and TB material”

    Every year around eight million pigs are slaughtered for meat in the UK. The UK also imports pork meat from other EU countries. Meat from pigs’ heads is recovered by specialised boning plants and goes into pies, sausages and other processed foods. Millions of us consume this meat many times each year.

    If the EU wants to portray itself as a responsible regulator of food safety standards, it might be thought that they would be strengthening food safety regulations in order to protect the public, not rowing back on them. Not so, according to the European Working Community for Food Inspection and Consumer Protection (EFWFC) which represents the EU’s meat inspectors.

    “Consumers are being exposed to an “avoidable risk” of disease after a reduction of official controls in food inspections of pig and poultry carcasses across the EU. Diseased meat is being eaten by consumers in the UK and EU, including pus from abscesses and tuberculosis lesions from pigs’ heads.”

    – The European Working Community for Food Inspection and Consumer Protection (EFWFC), 15 Sept 2020

    The EU has lowered its food safety requirements

    The EU introduced new measures for checking pigs entering the food chain. This reduced the requirement for checking pig meat from a thorough inspection to a visual-only inspection, and this was warned about back in 2014.

    A visual-only inspection misses underlying diseases. In the words of Ron Spellman, the Deputy Secretary of the European Working Community for Food Inspection and Consumer Protection (EFWFC) which represents EU meat inspectors:-

    “Inspectors stopped cutting lymph nodes in pigs’ heads, which are known to contain abscesses and tuberculosis lesions. Under previous systems, the pigs’ head would have been rejected for food, but now the meat is minced to make sausages and meat pies, spreading the pus from the abscesses and TB material throughout these products.”

    “I don’t think you can prove it’s safe to feed people abscesses, pus and TB material.”

    Mr Spellman is also a member of the UK’s Association of Meat Inspectors, and he has been warning about the EU’s lowering of food safety standards for many years. In June 2014 Mr Spellman told the BBC: “Last year we know that there were at least 37,000 pigs’ heads with abscesses or tuberculosis lesions in lymph nodes in the head. They won’t be cut now. There’s no way to see those little abscesses, little tuberculosis lesions, without cutting those lymph nodes.”

    Mr Spelman also speculated on the reasons for the EU’s reduction in its food safety requirements: “These changes are motivated not by science or a desire to protect the consumer but are politically motivated to give the meat industry what they want: the reductions and eventual removal of official independent meat inspection.”

       

    The size of the problem

    We looked at the Food Standards Agency’s (FSA) report from January 2020. Here is what they said about ‘foodborne diseases’ – what most people would call ‘food poisoning’:-

    “We estimate that there were 2.4 million cases of foodborne disease in the UK in 2018, with 222,000 GP presentations and 16,400 hospital admissions.”

    – “Foodborne Disease Estimates for the United Kingdom in 2018”, FSA Report Jan 2020

    By any measure this effect on public health from ‘foodborne diseases’ is highly significant.

    So what did the EU Commission have to say about all of this?

    The EU Commission’s justification for the reduction in meat inspections is that the cutting up of pig carcasses as part of meat inspections increases the risk of harmful bacteria spreading onto meat.

    A spokesperson for the European commission said: “The European Union retains some of the highest food safety standards in the world – this is a key priority. This is why the European Food Safety Authority provides expert scientific advice and recommendations while national authorities are responsible to carry out inspections in accordance with the official controls legislation.

    “Any meat with lesions indicating an animal disease such as TB, or abscesses, or any pathological or organoleptic changes, must be considered as unfit for human consumption and not be placed on the market.”

    The meat inspectors would doubtless agree with these worthy sentiments. However the problem as they see it is that the EU has reduced its safety requirements and ordered visual-only inspections of pigs. As Mr Spellman of the European Working Community for Food Inspection and Consumer Protection says: “There’s no way to see those little abscesses, little tuberculosis lesions, without cutting those lymph nodes.”

    In the case of food safety standards above we have shown how yet again the EU claims one thing and does another.

    “You are what you eat”, as the saying goes. If that is the case then buy British this Christmas. And we will never look at a pork pie in quite the same way again.

    Observations

    Are Rejoiners interested in facts?

    Sadly we see a continuing flood of Rejoiner comments across social media which have absolutely no grounding in any facts whatsover. Everything EU is apparently good, and everything the UK does is bad.

    To paraphrase George Orwell in ‘Animal Farm’, “EU good, UK bad”.

    We very much hope that these people will take the trouble to read the facts we published yesterday and today, and might revise their opinions. Unfortunately our experience is that they read nothing and simply hurl foul-mouthed abuse.

    Are we ‘triggered’? Do we have to go to a ‘safe space’ and lie down for a while? Do we then report this to the police, to the EU Commission, to the social media platforms? Of course not. We’re adults.

    We can deal with the abuse by simply ignoring it and continuing to churn out the official facts. If Rejoiners don’t want to read these facts, that’s down to them. All we ask is that the next Government never acts on their wild fantasies.

    We must get reports like this out there

    Reports like the one above take far longer to research, write and produce than many people realise. If they were easy, readers would see other organisations also producing these daily. However, there’s little point in the Facts4EU.Org team working long hours, seven days-a-week, if we lack the resources to promote them effectively – to the public, to MPs, and to the media. This is where you come in, dear reader.

    Facts4EU.Org needs you today

    We are a ‘not for profit’ team (we make a loss) and any payment goes towards the actual work, not plush London offices, lunch or taxi expenses, or other luxuries of some organisations.

    We badly need more of our thousands of readers to become members, to support this work. Could this be you, today? It’s quick and easy, we give you a choice of two highly secure payment providers, and we do NOT ask you for further support if you pay once. We just hope you keep supporting us. Your membership stays anonymous unless you tell us otherwise.

    Please don’t assume that other people will keep us going – we don’t receive enough to survive and we need your help today. Could you help us? We rely 100% on public contributions from readers like you.

    If you believe in a fully-free, independent, and sovereign United Kingdom, please join now by clicking on one of the links below or you can use our Support page here. You will receive a personal, friendly ‘thank you’ from a member of our team within 48 hours. Thank you.

    [ Sources: EU Commission | UK DEFRA ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.

    Brexit Facts4EU.Org, Sat 16 Dec 2023

    Click here to go to our news headlines

    Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
    And don’t forget to actually post your message after you have previewed it!

    Share this article on

    Since before the EU Referendum, Brexit Facts4EU.Org
    has been the most prolific researcher and publisher of Brexit facts in the world.

    Supported by MPs, MEPs, & other groups, our work has impact.

    We think facts matter.
    Please donate today, so that we can continue to ensure a clean Brexit is finally delivered.

    Any credit card user

    Donate

    Subscribe

    Paypal Users Only – Choose amount first

  • As COP28 closes, we show how the UK has reduced greenhouse gases twice as fast as the EU

    Some EU countries emit 60% more greenhouse gases per person than the British

    Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2023

    This is happening in our backyard – Where’s Greta on this?

    As COP28 began in Dubai, on 01 Dec 2023 the EU Commission published a typically upbeat assessment of how it has been doing on reducing greenhouse gases over the past 10 years. Our analysis shows, however, just how far behind they are compared to the United Kingdom. For example the Poles are churning out over 60% more tonnes of greenhouse gases per person than the British.

    With the global jamboree in Dubai coming to an end, Facts4EU.Org presents an analysis of the official data on greenhouse gas emissions. This may give food for thought to all the delegates as they board their high-carbon-footprint private jets, en route back to their home countries.

    Brexit Facts4EU.Org Summary

    Tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions per person, 2021

    These include carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide from all sources, including land-use change. They are measured in tonnes of carbon dioxide-equivalents.

    • Poland : 10.0 tonnes (60% higher than the UK)
    • Germany : 8.9 tonnes (42% higher than the UK)
    • EU27 average : 7.6 tonnes (21% higher than the UK)
    • United Kingdom : 6.3 tonnes

    [Source: OurWorldInData.org, Oxford University – latest available data.]

    © Brexit Facts4EU.Org 2023 – click to enlarge

    The EU Commission’s bizarre propaganda

    Faced with the reality of the actual data, the EU’s statisticians clearly decided they needed to be creative. The best they could come up with was to use the unusual metric of ‘tonnes per employed person’.

    One of the reasons this is odd is because all of us are in some way responsible for greenhouse gas emissions, regardless of whether we are employed or not. We have not seen this strange metric used by any other body and are sticking with the accepted “emissions of greenhouse gases per person” measure.

    Credit : EU Commission 2023

    The UK has been reducing emissions more than twice as fast as the EU

    Not only are the British people responsible for less emissions of greenhouse gases per person, but this is falling at a faster rate than in the EU.

    In fact the fall in the UK in the last decade is more than double that of the EU.

    Brexit Facts4EU.Org Summary

    Percentage fall in tonnes of greenhouse gases per person, 2012-2021

    [Source: OurWorldInData.org, Oxford University – latest available data.]

    © Brexit Facts4EU.Org 2023 – click to enlarge

    Observations

    A Facts4EU post-COP28 analysis of the UK’s progress versus the EU’s hypocrisy

    Given the results of our analysis of the official data above, It’s tempting to say to Brussels : “There you go. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.”

    Given the topic, however, this might not be the most appropriate expression to use.

    Instead we will simply say that the UK is far ahead of the EU on Net Zero, whatever any reader’s views on this subject. This report is not about the rights and wrongs of the climate change debate. The reason we analyse raw data and publish reports like this is because there is a widely-held view in the United Kingdom – particularly amongst our young people – that the EU is somehow “better” than the UK at doing everything.

    Over and again we publish authoritative reports showing this is not the case and that generally the reverse is true. Please help us to keep doing this by making a donation today. We are getting desperate.

    We must get reports like this out there

    Reports like the one above take far longer to research, write and produce than many people realise. If they were easy, readers would see other organisations also producing these daily. However, there’s little point in the Facts4EU.Org team working long hours, seven days-a-week, if we lack the resources to promote them effectively – to the public, to MPs, and to the media. This is where you come in, dear reader.

    Facts4EU.Org needs you today

    We are a ‘not for profit’ team (we make a loss) and any payment goes towards the actual work, not plush London offices, lunch or taxi expenses, or other luxuries of some organisations.

    We badly need more of our thousands of readers to become members, to support this work. Could this be you, today? It’s quick and easy, we give you a choice of two highly secure payment providers, and we do NOT ask you for further support if you pay once. We just hope you keep supporting us. Your membership stays anonymous unless you tell us otherwise.

    Please don’t assume that other people will keep us going – we don’t receive enough to survive and we need your help today. Could you help us? We rely 100% on public contributions from readers like you.

    If you believe in a fully-free, independent, and sovereign United Kingdom, please join now by clicking on one of the links below or you can use our Support page here. You will receive a personal, friendly ‘thank you’ from a member of our team within 48 hours. Thank you.

    [ Sources: EU Commission | Our World in Data (Oxford University) ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.

    Brexit Facts4EU.Org, Thurs 14 Dec 2023

    Click here to go to our news headlines

    Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
    And don’t forget to actually post your message after you have previewed it!

    Share this article on

    Since before the EU Referendum, Brexit Facts4EU.Org
    has been the most prolific researcher and publisher of Brexit facts in the world.

    Supported by MPs, MEPs, & other groups, our work has impact.

    We think facts matter.
    Please donate today, so that we can continue to ensure a clean Brexit is finally delivered.

    Any credit card user

    Donate

    Subscribe

    Paypal Users Only – Choose amount first